Financial Planner / Option Strategy Followup

by billb 31. March 2009 07:40
So back in February, I spoke of a friend's father who "discovered" a fool proof strategy that would return 90 something percent of his outlay a couple of times a year. If you look at the big words at the top of my blog, you can guess that skeptical is what I be's.  What's more, he mentioned it was an option strategy … my forte, and furthering my belief that his old man was full of the proverbial feces.

Well, I finally got a glimpse into the super secret strategy and as promised, I'm going to share (drum roll please).  It's a fairly conservative strategy, but no holy grail. Thankfully, friend's dad, we'll call him for short, has come off the holy grail bit.  I think he still puts too much stock (ahem!) into the strategy, but I hope to put some mathematical evidence before him so that he at least comes out of the clouds.  The strategy is buy 100 shares of SPY at the beginning of each month.  You then sell a call at the next strike and buy a LEAP put at one strike beneath your stock purchase price.  Here's what the P/L model looks like on the strategy.
 
 
(click to enlarge)
 
I wasn't quite spot on when I heard the strategy, I guessed that it had the profile of a calendar spread.  I was close.  It looks more like a butterfly since the strikes are flexible and therefore the profit zone can be wider.  Below, I've modeled a butterfly spread.
 
 
(click to enlarge)
 
The stock cost alone to open the first position is around $8,000.  Plus the LEAP Put isn't cheap (about $1500).  Assuming he's not getting margin credit, he's out $10,000 per spread.  Where with the butterfly, the cost of the one above is about $335.  The P/L profiles look nearly the same, I'm not sure about the greeks.  I think the first position is long vega where the butterfly is short vega.  Aside from being a dumb move from a margin standpoint, this is nowhere near a holy grail. The risk/reward looks somewhere near 1:3 and has a 3 to 1 odds of landing within one sigma of today's prices.  So breakeven at best.  Since options are a zero sum game, this is no surprise.  Any pricing discrepancies are usually arbed out before us little people even see them.

I really don't believe that putting this position on blindly month after month is going to outperform the stock market.  I think he's break even over time with the occasional streak of good luck.  Option positions, like stock positions, have to be put on  when you feel you know something that the market doesn't.  The market knows what the first of the month is and what the volatility of the S&P 500 is.  This is not news.  This is a viable strategy when other elements are taken into consideration such are price from mean and implied volatility.

I explained that like all options strategies, this one has a time and place.  I don’t discard any strategy.  To put it on blindly doesn't make a lot of sense.

Tags:

Options

Mean Reversion in a Bear Market Rally

by billb 30. March 2009 08:20

The news for the auto makers seems a bit bad, but nothing too unexpected.  Regardless, the futures are down hard this morning.  I'm always intrigued when unsurprisingly news has a surprising effect on the market.  I'm also intrigued when news has the opposite effect on a stock or the market.  Ever hear when earnings surpass estimates and the stock goes DOWN.  Some chalk it up to "buy the rumor, sell the news", but if that were the case, it would be a bit more consistent, IMHO. Let's have a look at my favorite "get the picture in a glance" chart. 

 
(click to enlarge)
 
I've posted this chart style a few times, but in case my readership has recently doubled (from 1 to 2), I'll explain it to the new guy.  The shaded areas on the price chart are bollinger bands which are plotted at 1 and 3 sigma.  1 sigma being a "normal" part of the range, 3 being extraordinarly rare.  The bottom pane is the MACD which allegedly gives us a reading of how overbought or oversold we are.  When the solid line crosses the dashed line, that may indicate a change in trend. So we have two indicators, bollinger reading pretty overbought and MACD looks way overbought.  Couple these readings with the fact that we're still very much in a bear market and what does that spell?  I have no idea, but my guess is that we're going to see some mean reversion.
 
Seems like a good time to sell some calls.  I have my eyes on some APR 86's which can be had for a .27 credit as of the close on Friday.  If there's a huge dip this morning as suggested by the futures, that credit could close fast, but should things stabilize this afternoon, I'll give it another look.  I may consider a vertical spread on this one since my risk profile is a little higher than I like historically.  If that were the case, I'd look at a bit closer to the money for about the same credit, so maybe the 85/87 or 85/88 put credit spread.  Because again, my bet is mean reversion, but that doesn't mean that the market couldn't rally above 8500-8600 and leave me with an in the money call.

Tags:

Markets | Options | Trading Systems

Energy's Negative Correlation to Equities

by billb 23. March 2009 11:59

It used to be when oil was up, the market was down and vice versa.  Gold, oil and to a certain extent bonds played a great hedge for an equity portfolio.  As the market and commodities flattened in 2008, the correlation between many things didn't hold up.  Everything went down and down hard.  Correlations are starting to return to "normal" as the market quazi stabilizes, or at least as we become accustomed to volatility.  With one exception.  Energy is moving in near lock step with equities.

Have a look.

 

 
These two look like soul mates they're in such sync. This begs a question in my eyes.  When does it go back to "normal".  I'm sure any historically negatively correlated assets move in lockstep over short periods of time.
 
Just an observation I thought I'd share. 

Tags:

ETFs | Markets

New Builds of RightEdge All 'Round

by billb 10. March 2009 08:06

Released updates to both Edition 1 and Edition 2 (beta) of RightEdge yesterday.  There are a bunch of changes, but one is fairly visual.  We changed charting packages for the system results charts.  There were two reasons for the change.  One, the version we had didn't support 64 bit operating systems and second, we found what we feel are just all around better charts.  They are more visually appealing and easier to work with from a programming perspective.  I hope you enjoy them.

Here's links to the release notes and download information.

RightEdge 2008 Edition 1, Build 383. 

RightEdge 2008 Edition 2, Beta 8. 

Tags:

Trading Systems

CNBC in Action

by billb 5. March 2009 18:34

While I think the premise of the segment is a little off the mark, I still find the CNBC clips hysterical.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boMqAHTDZbw 

Tags:

Humor

Dow Below 7000

by billb 2. March 2009 09:36

It's a strange day.  We had a snow "storm" [cough] in Atlanta.  So I'm looking at a dusting of snow on roof tops and the Dow is below 7000.  These two pretty unlikely events, but they do happen and one should be prepared.  I'm in the process of shifting money from risk free accounts to brokerage accounts.  If the Dow stays below 7000 for the next week, I'll be getting some more.  As I mentioned before, I'm getting a little low on reserves.  To me, this plays to my plan perfectly.  At Dow 14,000, I was very high in cash reserves.  The buying just doesn't feel right and hasn't all the way down.  This is how I know it is likely the right thing.  In response to my real estate thoughts posed a week or so ago, we're keeping our eye out, but the thought of being a landlord and fear of the unknown has kept me snapping anything up just yet.  I'm not sure if I will at this point.

Strange days, strange days. 

Tags:

General | Markets

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.5.0.7
Theme by Mads Kristensen